19 January 2005: Ruppert pokes his tusks at 9/11 activism

It's offical, folks. With his 600-page bible now safely ensconced in the market and being fully self-credited for the final denouement of the 9/11 crimes, Mike Ruppert given us the green light to start dropping our efforts at 9/11-related political activism:

On Saturday night, January 15th, at Kane Hall, on the campus of the University of Washington in Seattle, a standing room only crowd of almost 1000 witnessed a new and aggressive presentation by Michael C. Ruppert, as he began the healing process of moving forward from the 9-11 focus many had associated him with for years. In front of a wildly enthusiastic throng of supporters, listeners, activists, and those just needing to learn and listen, Ruppert explained to them that although the 9-11 cause is still alive it is no longer useful as a political tool by activists. The window on 9/11 has closed. Simple as that.

You see, 9/11 truth activism is sooooo 2004. 9/11 is an old elephant, and it's time for new elephants. Have no fear, Ruppert will point them all out to us. Pink ones included, I hope.

How much more low can Ruppert go? I must admit, I'm finding it hard even to keep my composure. I hope we can see a full transcript ASAP and see if this is really as bad as it sounds.

It figures that this presentation would be sponsored by the chronically flawed 9/11 Visibility Project, closely linked to the chronically flawed 911truth.org grouping which helped lead the truth movement into the Victims' Families strategic quagmire.

Nor was I surprised to find at the website of another event sponsor, "Seattle Thunder", a keynote piece by David Korten. Now this leads us right into the usual dung. Allow me to digress.

Ex-Ford Foundation official Korten (lauded by Ruppert) is one of the Club of Rome's recently added propagandists, and was trained by the late Willis Harman, a key figure in the Tavistock/MK-ULTRA "Age of Aquarius"/"Global Mind Change" psychological warfare racket that planted itself in California in the early 1960s and operates to this day in a subtle and changing form, as deep-cover promoters of crypto-globalist social conditioning tailored to "left coast" sensibilities. Harman's main institutional connection was the Stanford Research Institute, a major government contractor with links to SAIC and RAND, and whose longtime major funding source has been George Schultz's Bechtel. Yes, that's the same George Schultz who helped assemble Bush's 'neocon' team and then helped install the Governator (which itself was a folloup to the "peak oil" dress rehearsal, the successful financial and political destabilization of California's government by the artifically manufactured "energy shortage" in 2000-01. Now we're close to the real curtain call, I think...). Schultz's colleague Jim Garrison (co-founder of Gorbachev's malthusian / globalist State of the World Forum and executive at the spook-infested new age outpost, Esalen) has recently gotten himself involved in "9/11 truth" as well... imagine that. This all ties in with the "global governance" cadre who have, as I perceive things, moved in big time to co-opt the 9/11 truth movement as an indirect, dialectical springboard for their agenda. And Ruppert has one way or another wound up in the thick of it. Korten, predictably, is also involved with the International Forum on Globalization, a product both financially and ideologically of London's elite Goldsmith banking family (longtime fixtures in the British oligarchy typified historically by the East India Company and 'Round Table' circles, and intermarried allies of the Rothschilds), and which functions as a global ringleader of the civil society / communitarian / systems-theorist / postmodernist diversionary controlled opposition to globalization. While I'm at it, it's worth noting that deep ecologist Edward Goldsmith recently hired "peak oil" pundit Andrew McKillop as energy editor for The Ecologist magazine. All in the family.

Incidentally, I've been doing some research on just these sort of connections amongst a large portion of those who signed on to the "9/11 Truth Statement". I will post some research notes soon.

Between co-optation and compromise on one side, and on the other, a damaging profusion of discrediting mud jobs and harebrained disinformation which have received regrettably wide exposure to the general public, the 9/11 Truth Movement has really suffered over the past year compared to what could have been. This fits the classic polarization / divide-and-conquer strategy, and I don't think it's by chance. But if there's any cold comfort to be found, I think it's that the mechanisms behind this are starting to make more sense to me. I've lost a lot of the optimism I had at the beginning of 2004, but I'm not at all ready to start viewing 9/11 activism as an elephant's ass.